Maribor Airport (photo: flightlog).
editor
Last update
Give a coffee
Information should be free for everyone, but good journalism costs a lot of money.
If you enjoyed this article, you can check Aviation.Direct voluntary invite for a cup of coffee.
In doing so, you support the journalistic work of our independent specialist portal for aviation, travel and tourism with a focus on the DA-CH region voluntarily without a paywall requirement.
If you did not like the article, we look forward to your constructive criticism and/or your comments either directly to the editor or to the team at with this link or alternatively via the comments.
Your
Aviation.Direct team

Maribor Airport: Slovenian government is once again looking for a solution

Advertising

The Slovenian government is trying to find a solution for Maribor Airport, which remains one of the least frequented airports in the former Yugoslavia. In 2024, the airport recorded just 2.330 passengers. Although Maribor has no regular scheduled flights, Portorož Airport on the country's coast was only able to welcome 22.782 travelers - despite a smaller catchment area. The majority of Maribor's passenger traffic comes from charter flights, which mainly transport sports teams.

Despite some efforts to find an operator for the airport, attempts in 2023 were unsuccessful. A promising joint proposal from the SIDrone aviation school and the Ključavničarstvo Kunc metalworking company failed to gain approval. SIDrone is now trying again to take over the management of the airport and recently presented a strategy to the National Council. This includes, among other things, the construction of a maintenance center for passenger and cargo aircraft and cooperation with neighboring airports. SIDrone is aiming for a long-term partnership that should last at least ten years.

In recent years, talks have also taken place with representatives of the leisure conglomerate Tui Group, who expressed interest in establishing a maintenance base in Maribor. The airport has been managed by DRI, a state-owned consulting and engineering company, since 2019, after the early withdrawal of Chinese investors in 2017 ended the previous 15-year lease agreement. However, a major obstacle for potential investors remains the lack of a spatial plan that would allow for expansion of the airport.

Advertising

Leave a Comment

Your e-mail address will not be published. Required fields are marked with * marked

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed..

Advertising