The European Court of Justice must deal with the Laudamotion engine defect and the subsequent evacuation of the then OE-LOA. The incident occurred on March 1, 2019 at London Stansted Airport. An Austrian woman is suing the company because she suffered post-traumatic stress disorder as a result of the incident. The British accident investigators heavily criticized the former Austrian airline in their final report. Among other things, the senior flight attendant in charge was accused of lacking previous experience. She was promoted after less than a year of practice. The authority also believes that evacuating the plane was not necessary and, on top of that, the captain's instructions were ignored. The pilots were even surprised that passengers were suddenly seen around the plane. However, since the still functioning engine was not switched off and the evacuation was initiated, a passenger was "thrown several meters through the air" according to court documents. The woman went to court. A passenger on the OE-LOA suffered post-traumatic stress disorder as a result of the incident and filed a lawsuit with the Schwechat District Court (reference number: 17 C 1014/19z-7). The defendant, Laudamotion GmbH, did not consider it necessary to comply with the court's summons, so the first instance issued a default judgment. Due to the absence, the plaintiff's position was fully upheld. The judgment of the Schwechat District Court is dated November 12, 2019. Laudamotion "skipped" first court hearing Apparently, the management of Laudamotion realized the significance of the default judgment, because the passenger was awarded a large amount of damages. This can also result in costly liability for consequential damages. The former