A heated debate has broken out in the German aviation industry: airlines are demanding a reduction in government location costs such as air traffic tax and fees for security and air traffic control facilities.
These burdens, the companies argue, put German airlines under pressure in international competition. But the Vereinigung Cockpit e. V. (VC), the union of German pilots, sees the situation in a more differentiated way and criticizes the one-sided blame placed on the airlines. Instead, it calls for an honest discussion of corporate responsibility and sustainable strategies.
Competitive Disadvantages and State Location Costs
The core of the current discussion revolves around the "government location costs", i.e. the fees and charges that airlines have to pay and which are comparatively high in Germany. These include the air traffic tax, which is lower or completely waived in many European countries, as well as the aviation security and air traffic control fees. These costs make domestic flights more expensive and thus reduce the competitiveness of German airlines compared to international competitors.
The Lufthansa Group, Germany's largest airline, has repeatedly pointed out these grievances. The Verdi trade union also recently supported the airlines' demand for a reduction in taxes in a petition in order to improve the location conditions for German airlines.
Vereinigung Cockpit calls for personal responsibility instead of blame
The Cockpit Association, which represents the interests of German pilots, criticizes the airlines' strategy of seeking political responsibility for the location problems solely with the federal government and state regulations. According to VC, this portrayal is not in line with reality, as it ignores the role of the airlines themselves in dealing with costs and competitive situations. Frank Blanken, VC's director of press and public relations, emphasizes that airlines also have a corporate responsibility to ensure their competitiveness through an effective cost structure and sustainable management strategies. "Complaining and moaning alone will not solve the challenges facing the German aviation industry," explains Blanken. "In our view, one-sided blame-shifting on politicians and attempts to win over the public by comparing apples and oranges will not lead to sustainable solutions."
Transparency and dialogue instead of populist demands
The association is calling for a transparent discussion about the real causes of the competitive disadvantages and is warning against a populist approach to the issue. Dr. Pinheiro, President of the VC, is calling on airline management to take responsibility for themselves and not to insist unilaterally on state relief. According to him, realistic and sustainable corporate strategies are necessary in order to find long-term solutions for Germany as a business location. Instead of looking for scapegoats, Pinheiro is calling for cooperation between all stakeholders, which not only focuses on short-term profits, but also on the long-term stability and sustainability of the industry.
"We will not follow a populist path that aims to portray state institutions as scapegoats, for example. We want feasible solutions - and this requires an honest discussion first," said Dr. Pinheiro. This clear positioning of the VC differs fundamentally from the demands of the airlines, which attribute their economic problems largely to state taxes and fees.
International competitive conditions: A differentiated view is necessary
A comparison of the international competitive conditions shows that Germany does indeed have above-average location costs. However, the conditions are not as clear-cut as some airline representatives make them out to be. The collection of air traffic taxes and fees varies greatly from country to country, and many European countries also have extensive safety and environmental protection regulations that lead to higher operating costs. For German airlines such as Lufthansa, which are firmly anchored in the European market, there are additional challenges, including competition from low-cost carriers and state-subsidized airlines from the Middle East.
This competition is forcing German airlines to adapt, but according to the VC, this should not take the form of a reduction in state taxes, but rather through increased efficiency and a strategic focus on sustainable corporate management. The German aviation industry must focus on developing further in terms of ecological and social responsibility, as international competition in terms of environmental standards is becoming increasingly strict.
Environmental Aspects and Climate Protection in Aviation
Another central aspect of the location cost debate is climate protection. Air traffic is a significant factor in global CO₂ emissions, and many of the fees levied, such as the air traffic tax, are intended to offset the external environmental costs of flying. The VC emphasizes that these contributions are essential in the interests of climate protection and that airlines that are pushing for a reduction in these fees are doing so in contradiction to their own corporate responsibility. Instead of calling for tax cuts, airlines should promote innovative technologies and sustainable fuels to reduce their CO₂ footprint.
An appeal for responsibility and strategic adaptation
The discussion about location costs for German airlines reveals a clear contradiction: on the one hand, there are legitimate demands for fair competitive conditions, and on the other hand, there is the need for personal responsibility and strategic adaptation to the challenges of the future.
The VC is calling on airlines to show a stronger commitment to sustainable corporate governance and to honestly address their own responsibilities. From the Cockpit Association's point of view, focusing solely on state relief is a short-sighted approach that will not solve the industry's long-term challenges. In order to make air traffic in Germany sustainable, a comprehensive and honest discussion is needed that takes into account both the interests of companies and the need for climate protection measures.
and 