Brazil withdraws “CSeries complaint” against Canada

Embraer 190-E2 in factory paint (Photo: Jan Gruber).
Embraer 190-E2 in factory paint (Photo: Jan Gruber).

Brazil withdraws “CSeries complaint” against Canada

Embraer 190-E2 in factory paint (Photo: Jan Gruber).
Advertising

For several years now, a dispute over subsidies has been raging between Boeing and Airbus via the World Trade Organization. Bombardier and Embraer were also quarreling, but the Brazilian government has now decided to withdraw the complaint against Canada.

Embraer stated in an initial reaction that the decision is welcomed and that more effective ways are seen. The aircraft manufacturer accused Bombardier that the Canadian government and the Quebec region had made illegal subsidies for the CSeries program. This has meanwhile been sold to Airbus and, with the exception of a few business jet programs, Bombardier withdrew completely from aircraft construction.

Embraer believes that government subsidies distort competition. In the Bombardier case, however, the framework conditions have changed, because the CSeries is now owned by Airbus and is known under the brand name A220. A plant was also set up in the United States. The Brazilian competitor, whose cooperation with Boeing ended last year, now considers the WTO complaint against Canada to be no longer effective and therefore welcomes the government's decision. Now you want to negotiate bilaterally. The goal is to create globally uniform competitive conditions.

Leave a Comment

Your e-mail address will not be published. Required fields are marked with * marked

This website uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn more about how your comment data is processed.

Editor of this article:

[ssba buttons]

Nobody likes paywalls
- not even Aviation.Direct!

Information should be free for everyone, but good journalism costs a lot of money.

If you enjoyed this article, you can check Aviation.Direct voluntary for a cup of coffee Coffee trail (for them it's free to use).

In doing so, you support the journalistic work of our independent specialist portal for aviation, travel and tourism with a focus on the DA-CH region voluntarily without a paywall requirement.

If you did not like the article, we look forward to your constructive criticism and / or your suggestions for improvement, either directly to the editor or to the team at with this link or alternatively via the comments.

Your
Aviation.Direct team
paywalls
nobody likes!

About the editor

[ssba buttons]

Nobody likes paywalls
- not even Aviation.Direct!

Information should be free for everyone, but good journalism costs a lot of money.

If you enjoyed this article, you can check Aviation.Direct voluntary for a cup of coffee Coffee trail (for them it's free to use).

In doing so, you support the journalistic work of our independent specialist portal for aviation, travel and tourism with a focus on the DA-CH region voluntarily without a paywall requirement.

If you did not like the article, we look forward to your constructive criticism and / or your suggestions for improvement, either directly to the editor or to the team at with this link or alternatively via the comments.

Your
Aviation.Direct team
paywalls
nobody likes!

Leave a Comment

Your e-mail address will not be published. Required fields are marked with * marked

This website uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn more about how your comment data is processed.

Advertising