Greenpeace: "The harmfulness of aviation to the climate has been underestimated"

Ship of the NGO Greenpeace (Photo: Pixabay).
Ship of the NGO Greenpeace (Photo: Pixabay).

Greenpeace: "The harmfulness of aviation to the climate has been underestimated"

Ship of the NGO Greenpeace (Photo: Pixabay).
Advertising

The environmental protection organization Greenpeace believes, based on a study by the EU Commission, that the harmful effects of air traffic on the climate have been underestimated, confirmed. The NGO also criticizes the fact that the European governments are taking over the industry with around 37 billion euros.

Greenpeace argues that carbon dioxide emissions are not the only problem, and that commercial aircraft also emit other harmful substances. Among other things, nitrogen oxides and contaminated water vapor are mentioned. The impact of these substances would be twice as strong as the carbon dioxide emissions.

The environmental protection organization criticizes the fact that 30 billion euros in financial aid for airlines have already been pledged and a further 7,9 billion euros are currently being negotiated. The granting of the funds would not be tied to any legally binding environmental conditions that would be sufficient to fulfill the Paris Climate Agreement. In particular, the Austrian state aid for Austrian Airlines in the amount of 450 million euros criticizes Greenpeace and accuses “inadequate conditions in terms of climate protection and social equality”.

“The studies by the European Commission show that air traffic is flying us into the climate crisis. Nevertheless, politics allows tens of billions of billions of dollars to flow into airlines' pockets. The recovery funds must be invested in green mobility, which offers solid, sustainable jobs and affordable, accessible transport for all. The Commission must end tax exemptions and ban short-haul flights. The same applies to Austria: We cannot afford any other lifeline for the climate-hostile aviation industry, ”said Greenpeace climate expert Adam Pawloff.

The NGO, with reference to the present study by the EU Commissionthat short-haul flights should be banned. If there is a “clean alternative”, the tax advantages on plane tickets in international traffic are also to be abolished. Investments in rail transport are also required and, at the same time, the EU Commission should protect employees in the aviation industry in order to enable them to have a “fair transition process”.

Comment

  • Scrap metal aviators, 25. November 2020 @ 13: 45

    Greenpeace should rather take care of them
    Coal and oil power plants as well as ships take care of that do not have filters in their exhaust pipes.
    Then there are those who quietly and secretly go into operation every year, at least the ships must have filters, in countries like India or large parts of Africa where more and more electricity is needed, Indonesia and the Philippines, kahlor power plants are springing up like mushrooms. Greenpeace is powerless there.
    You have a scapegoat, now it's aviation, although it is on the ground, it is still demonized by these people.
    It doesn't matter that there are millions of jobs in aviation, and whoever has to travel from Linz, Salzburg to Frankfurt, Düsseldorf, Hamburg should sit for a whole day on the train or bus, then Greenpeace should kindly cover the cost of the time required.
    If, just one example, a medical device technician costs € 120 or more per hour. They don't have much brains at Greenpeace, most of them fly for work and not for fun.
    You have to make yourself important so that you get noticed in the press, they should do something against the plastic in the oceans, but not against the already battered aviation.

Leave a Comment

Your e-mail address will not be published. Required fields are marked with * marked

This website uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn more about how your comment data is processed.

Editor of this article:

[ssba buttons]

Nobody likes paywalls
- not even Aviation.Direct!

Information should be free for everyone, but good journalism costs a lot of money.

If you enjoyed this article, you can check Aviation.Direct voluntary for a cup of coffee Coffee trail (for them it's free to use).

In doing so, you support the journalistic work of our independent specialist portal for aviation, travel and tourism with a focus on the DA-CH region voluntarily without a paywall requirement.

If you did not like the article, we look forward to your constructive criticism and / or your suggestions for improvement, either directly to the editor or to the team at with this link or alternatively via the comments.

Your
Aviation.Direct team
paywalls
nobody likes!

About the editor

[ssba buttons]

Nobody likes paywalls
- not even Aviation.Direct!

Information should be free for everyone, but good journalism costs a lot of money.

If you enjoyed this article, you can check Aviation.Direct voluntary for a cup of coffee Coffee trail (for them it's free to use).

In doing so, you support the journalistic work of our independent specialist portal for aviation, travel and tourism with a focus on the DA-CH region voluntarily without a paywall requirement.

If you did not like the article, we look forward to your constructive criticism and / or your suggestions for improvement, either directly to the editor or to the team at with this link or alternatively via the comments.

Your
Aviation.Direct team
paywalls
nobody likes!

Comment

  • Scrap metal aviators, 25. November 2020 @ 13: 45

    Greenpeace should rather take care of them
    Coal and oil power plants as well as ships take care of that do not have filters in their exhaust pipes.
    Then there are those who quietly and secretly go into operation every year, at least the ships must have filters, in countries like India or large parts of Africa where more and more electricity is needed, Indonesia and the Philippines, kahlor power plants are springing up like mushrooms. Greenpeace is powerless there.
    You have a scapegoat, now it's aviation, although it is on the ground, it is still demonized by these people.
    It doesn't matter that there are millions of jobs in aviation, and whoever has to travel from Linz, Salzburg to Frankfurt, Düsseldorf, Hamburg should sit for a whole day on the train or bus, then Greenpeace should kindly cover the cost of the time required.
    If, just one example, a medical device technician costs € 120 or more per hour. They don't have much brains at Greenpeace, most of them fly for work and not for fun.
    You have to make yourself important so that you get noticed in the press, they should do something against the plastic in the oceans, but not against the already battered aviation.

Leave a Comment

Your e-mail address will not be published. Required fields are marked with * marked

This website uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn more about how your comment data is processed.

Advertising