Lufthansa: low costers are putting pressure on hubs Vienna and Brussels

Austrian Airlines at Vienna Airport (Photo: Austrian Airlines).
Austrian Airlines at Vienna Airport (Photo: Austrian Airlines).

Lufthansa: low costers are putting pressure on hubs Vienna and Brussels

Austrian Airlines at Vienna Airport (Photo: Austrian Airlines).
Advertising

The hubs in Brussels and Vienna are to play a smaller role in the Lufthansa Group's “post-corona strategy”. The so-called premium traffic is to be routed primarily via Munich, Frankfurt and Zurich. Basically, however, they are committed to the group-wide hub-and-spoke principle.

The Handelsblatt even writes that within the group of companies the so-called “premium claim” should be reserved exclusively for Swiss and Lufthansa themselves. This can also be derived from the aircraft allocations, because brand-new machines are reserved for the crane and its offshoot in Switzerland on both short and long-haul routes. For Austrian Airlines, for example, not a single machine is planned - at least officially.

The situation is different for the cheap subsidiaries, because Lufthansa wants to grow strongly with both Eurowings and Eurowings Discover. For this purpose, capacity has already been shifted “from mother to daughter”. Both brands have already been taken into account in new additions or will be in the future. Eurowings should increasingly no longer focus only on the DA-CH region, but rather expand into a pan-European carrier modeled on Ryanair, Wizz Air and Easyjet. Bases are already maintained in Pristina and Palma, and Prague and Stockholm-Arlanda will be added shortly. Others are in the planning phase.

The Lufthansa Group drastically reduced its fleet in the wake of the corona pandemic. However, on closer inspection it becomes clear that smaller aircraft should dominate on long-haul routes. From this it can be deduced that you want to head for more destinations or fly to existing ones more frequently. On the short and medium-haul routes, the Eurowings brand in particular wants to consolidate the route network in order to be able to compete with Wizz Air, Ryanair and Easyjet. In some markets this could be an extremely costly proposition. From Germany, Lufthansa is increasingly relying on Eurowings Discover for leisure traffic, which is also likely to have cost reasons. In contrast to other group airlines, they do not (yet) have a collective agreement, which has been sharply criticized by Verdi, UFO and VC, among others.

Comment

  • daxre, 11. October 2021 @ 13: 37

    So here I have to put a stop to it. I'm sorry, the article has been researched in a terrible way and Handelsblatt as a source is initially extremely risky, and if you use this source, then maybe you should compare the facts.

    I'll clean up a bit, maybe you can then correct the article or delete it directly, because with correct information the article is completely different from the current one.

    Paragraph 1: This information is not public, has never been communicated in this way. There are also no rumors from Lufthansa / Austrian / Brussels ranks that this is a mix of misinterpretation

    Paragraph 2: Premium claim, Lufthansa has stamped Austrian and Brussels as value carriers, but Carsten Spohr has already explained that AUA is not counted as a premium carrier, as this designation is used to denote the airlines with first class offers to call. Carsten Spohr has already denied that Austrian therefore does not have a premium claim. By the way, there are no officially planned long-haul planes for Switzerland. The A320neo family on short / medium-haul routes, all A220s have already been delivered. Brussels officially (!) Gets brand new A320neo. Due to the officially confirmed orders, it is wrong to downplay the importance of the airlines in the Group's hub concept. Austrian will unofficially get 787 next year. Information is usually heard in the form of rumors before it is officially confirmed. In the past, however, the rumors have been confirmed suspiciously often. (See e.g. Comeback A340-600). Incidentally, there are currently no rumors at all about brand-new aircraft about Swiss long-haul fleet, but at Austrian there are.

    Paragraph 3: Eurowings and Eurowings Discover should grow strongly, that is correct. But does not rule out growth in the crane itself. The Austrian and Brussels do not get in Eurowings' enclosure at all. It is only logical that Brussels and Austrian restrict themselves to one hub, Vienna has already given Eurowings back to Austrian. Eurowings is getting some brand new machines, that is correct, but Eurowings Discover is not. The aircraft are used machines from the inventory of Lufthansa, SunExpress Germany and Edelweiss. And the Lufthansa A330s, like the SXD A330s, are no longer the youngest either. The 3 A330-200s in the LH Group have already reached their expiry date by 2025 at the latest. That you choose Eurowings to grow pan-European is clear from the name alone. But even there, the airline does not interfere with either Austrian or Brussels. It is clear that aircraft will be required for such an expansion. But that does not mean that other group airlines are becoming less important. You can also develop new business areas without competing with other airlines in the group. The group's managers have often officially communicated that they do not want to orientate themselves towards Ryanair, EasyJet and Wizzair!

    Paragraph 4: This is again the same as in the first paragraph. Interpretation of misinformation. Incidentally, including the A1 departures, the AUA fleet has been enlarged in recent years. In terms of capacity, the AUA growth is even greater, and that becomes even greater when you consider that the aircraft have a more closely timed flight schedule.

    I sincerely ask for correction, because here an airline group is completely unnecessary and wrongly depicted in a bad light!

Leave a Comment

Your e-mail address will not be published. Required fields are marked with * marked

This website uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn more about how your comment data is processed.

Editor of this article:

[ssba buttons]

Nobody likes paywalls
- not even Aviation.Direct!

Information should be free for everyone, but good journalism costs a lot of money.

If you enjoyed this article, you can check Aviation.Direct voluntary for a cup of coffee Coffee trail (for them it's free to use).

In doing so, you support the journalistic work of our independent specialist portal for aviation, travel and tourism with a focus on the DA-CH region voluntarily without a paywall requirement.

If you did not like the article, we look forward to your constructive criticism and / or your suggestions for improvement, either directly to the editor or to the team at with this link or alternatively via the comments.

Your
Aviation.Direct team
paywalls
nobody likes!

About the editor

[ssba buttons]

Nobody likes paywalls
- not even Aviation.Direct!

Information should be free for everyone, but good journalism costs a lot of money.

If you enjoyed this article, you can check Aviation.Direct voluntary for a cup of coffee Coffee trail (for them it's free to use).

In doing so, you support the journalistic work of our independent specialist portal for aviation, travel and tourism with a focus on the DA-CH region voluntarily without a paywall requirement.

If you did not like the article, we look forward to your constructive criticism and / or your suggestions for improvement, either directly to the editor or to the team at with this link or alternatively via the comments.

Your
Aviation.Direct team
paywalls
nobody likes!

Comment

  • daxre, 11. October 2021 @ 13: 37

    So here I have to put a stop to it. I'm sorry, the article has been researched in a terrible way and Handelsblatt as a source is initially extremely risky, and if you use this source, then maybe you should compare the facts.

    I'll clean up a bit, maybe you can then correct the article or delete it directly, because with correct information the article is completely different from the current one.

    Paragraph 1: This information is not public, has never been communicated in this way. There are also no rumors from Lufthansa / Austrian / Brussels ranks that this is a mix of misinterpretation

    Paragraph 2: Premium claim, Lufthansa has stamped Austrian and Brussels as value carriers, but Carsten Spohr has already explained that AUA is not counted as a premium carrier, as this designation is used to denote the airlines with first class offers to call. Carsten Spohr has already denied that Austrian therefore does not have a premium claim. By the way, there are no officially planned long-haul planes for Switzerland. The A320neo family on short / medium-haul routes, all A220s have already been delivered. Brussels officially (!) Gets brand new A320neo. Due to the officially confirmed orders, it is wrong to downplay the importance of the airlines in the Group's hub concept. Austrian will unofficially get 787 next year. Information is usually heard in the form of rumors before it is officially confirmed. In the past, however, the rumors have been confirmed suspiciously often. (See e.g. Comeback A340-600). Incidentally, there are currently no rumors at all about brand-new aircraft about Swiss long-haul fleet, but at Austrian there are.

    Paragraph 3: Eurowings and Eurowings Discover should grow strongly, that is correct. But does not rule out growth in the crane itself. The Austrian and Brussels do not get in Eurowings' enclosure at all. It is only logical that Brussels and Austrian restrict themselves to one hub, Vienna has already given Eurowings back to Austrian. Eurowings is getting some brand new machines, that is correct, but Eurowings Discover is not. The aircraft are used machines from the inventory of Lufthansa, SunExpress Germany and Edelweiss. And the Lufthansa A330s, like the SXD A330s, are no longer the youngest either. The 3 A330-200s in the LH Group have already reached their expiry date by 2025 at the latest. That you choose Eurowings to grow pan-European is clear from the name alone. But even there, the airline does not interfere with either Austrian or Brussels. It is clear that aircraft will be required for such an expansion. But that does not mean that other group airlines are becoming less important. You can also develop new business areas without competing with other airlines in the group. The group's managers have often officially communicated that they do not want to orientate themselves towards Ryanair, EasyJet and Wizzair!

    Paragraph 4: This is again the same as in the first paragraph. Interpretation of misinformation. Incidentally, including the A1 departures, the AUA fleet has been enlarged in recent years. In terms of capacity, the AUA growth is even greater, and that becomes even greater when you consider that the aircraft have a more closely timed flight schedule.

    I sincerely ask for correction, because here an airline group is completely unnecessary and wrongly depicted in a bad light!

Leave a Comment

Your e-mail address will not be published. Required fields are marked with * marked

This website uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn more about how your comment data is processed.

Advertising